🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in graves at risk from coastal erosion state that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the problem is creating unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their loved ones.

A Looming Threat to Ancient Graveyards

The council have singled out three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being consumed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the situation sets out a range of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in safer locations. Authorities maintain it is for the community to determine how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. People will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing in search of valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril

Along the shoreline lies the grave of a former paratrooper who died while working overseas. His mother said she lost sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to think this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some want additional sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to continue for now. Different voices contend the moment for moving graves is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the choices. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. It requires good community discussions to discover the right solutions for each village.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sadness for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in life after death, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the physical loss of sacred ground.